Difference between Setter Injection vs Constructor Injection in Spring framework

本文深入探讨了Spring框架下Setter与Constructor注入的差异,包括配置文件读取便利性、依赖确保、安全性及处理循环依赖的能力。重点讨论了在不同场景下选择使用Setter或Constructor注入的优势。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >


Spring Setter vs Constructor Injection
Spring  supports two types of dependency Injection, using setter method e.g. setXXX() where XXX is dependency or via constructor argument. First way of  dependency injection is known as  setter injection while later is known as  constructor injection. Both approaches of Injecting dependency on Spring bean has there pros and cons, which we will see in this Spring framework article.  Difference between Setter Injection and Constructor Injection in Spring is also a popular  Spring framework interview question.Some time interviewer also ask as When do you use Setter Injection over Constructor injection in Spring or simply benefits of using setter vs constructor injection in Spring framework. Points discussed in this article not only help you to understand Setter vs Constructor Injection but also Spring's dependency Injection process. By the way if you are new in Spring framework and learning it, you may want to take a look at my list of  5 good books to learn Spring framework. That will certainly help on  your learning process. Since Spring is now a must have skill for  Java programmers, it worth putting time and effort to learn this powerful framework

Difference between Setter and Constructor Injection in Spring framework

Setter vs Constructor Injection in Spring framework - Interview questionAs I said earlier Spring supports both setter and constructor Injection which are two standard way of injecting dependency on beans managed by IOC constructor. Spring framework doesn't support Interface Injection on which dependency is injected by implementing a particular  interface. In this section we will see couple of difference between setter and constructor Injection, which will help you decide when to use setter Injection over constructor Injection in Spring and vice-versa.

1) Fundamental difference between setter and constructor injection, as there name implies is How dependency is injected.  Setter injection in Spring uses setter methods like setDependency() to inject dependency on any bean managed by Spring's IOC container. On the other hand constructor injection uses  constructor to inject dependency on any Spring managed bean.

2) Because of using setter method, setter Injection in more readable than constructor injection in Spring configuration file usually applicationContext.xml . Since setter method has name e.g. setReporotService() by reading Spring  XML config file you know which dependency you are setting. While in constructor injection, since it uses index to inject dependency, its not as readable as setter injection and you need to refer either  Java documentation or code to find which index corresponds to which property.

3) Another difference between setter vs constructor injection in Spring and one of the drawback of  setter injection is that it does not ensures  dependency Injection. You can not guarantee that certain dependency is injected or not, which means you may have an object with incomplete dependency. On other hand constructor Injection does not allow you to construct object, until your dependencies are ready.

4) One more drawback of setter Injection is Security. By using setter injection, you can  override certain dependency which is not possible which is not possible with constructor injection because every time you call constructor, a new object is gets created.

5) One of our reader Murali Mohan Reddy, pointed out one more difference between Setter and Constructor injection in Spring, where later can help, if there is a circular dependency between two object A and B. 
If Object A and B are dependent each other i.e A is depends ob B and vice-versa. Spring throws ObjectCurrentlyInCreationException while creating objects of A and B bcz A object cannot be created until B is created and vice-versa. So spring can resolve circular dependencies through setter-injection. Objects constructed before setter methods invoked.

See comment section for more inputs from other readers.

When to use Setter Injection over Constructor Injection in Spring
Setter Injection has upper hand over Constructor Injection in terms of readability. Since for configuring Spring we use  XML files, readability is much bigger concern. Also drawback of setter Injection around ensuring mandatory dependency injected or not can be handled by configuring Spring to check dependency using "dependency-check" attribute of  tag or tag. Another worth noting point to remember while comparing Setter Injection vs Constructor Injection is that, once number of dependency crossed a threshold e.g. 5 or 6 its handy manageable to passing dependency via constructor. Setter Injection is preferred choice when number of dependency to be injected is lot more than normal, if some of those arguments is optional than using  Builder design pattern is also a good option.

In Summary both Setter Injection and Constructor Injection has there own advantage and disadvantage. Good thing about Spring is that it doesn't restrict you to use either Setter Injection or Constructor Injection and you are free to use both of them in one Spring configuration file. Use Setter injection when number of dependency is more or you need readability. Use Constructor Injection when Object must be created with all of its dependency.


Read more:  http://javarevisited.blogspot.com/2012/11/difference-between-setter-injection-vs-constructor-injection-spring-framework.html#ixzz2gdudy91I
内容概要:本文深入探讨了Kotlin语言在函数式编程和跨平台开发方面的特性和优势,结合详细的代码案例,展示了Kotlin的核心技巧和应用场景。文章首先介绍了高阶函数和Lambda表达式的使用,解释了它们如何简化集合操作和回调函数处理。接着,详细讲解了Kotlin Multiplatform(KMP)的实现方式,包括共享模块的创建和平台特定模块的配置,展示了如何通过共享业务逻辑代码提高开发效率。最后,文章总结了Kotlin在Android开发、跨平台移动开发、后端开发和Web开发中的应用场景,并展望了其未来发展趋势,指出Kotlin将继续在函数式编程和跨平台开发领域不断完善和发展。; 适合人群:对函数式编程和跨平台开发感兴趣的开发者,尤其是有一定编程基础的Kotlin初学者和中级开发者。; 使用场景及目标:①理解Kotlin中高阶函数和Lambda表达式的使用方法及其在实际开发中的应用场景;②掌握Kotlin Multiplatform的实现方式,能够在多个平台上共享业务逻辑代码,提高开发效率;③了解Kotlin在不同开发领域的应用场景,为选择合适的技术栈提供参考。; 其他说明:本文不仅提供了理论知识,还结合了大量代码案例,帮助读者更好地理解和实践Kotlin的函数式编程特性和跨平台开发能力。建议读者在学习过程中动手实践代码案例,以加深理解和掌握。
内容概要:本文深入探讨了利用历史速度命令(HVC)增强仿射编队机动控制性能的方法。论文提出了HVC在仿射编队控制中的潜在价值,通过全面评估HVC对系统的影响,提出了易于测试的稳定性条件,并给出了延迟参数与跟踪误差关系的显式不等式。研究为两轮差动机器人(TWDRs)群提供了系统的协调编队机动控制方案,并通过9台TWDRs的仿真和实验验证了稳定性和综合性能改进。此外,文中还提供了详细的Python代码实现,涵盖仿射编队控制类、HVC增强、稳定性条件检查以及仿真实验。代码不仅实现了论文的核心思想,还扩展了邻居历史信息利用、动态拓扑优化和自适应控制等性能提升策略,更全面地反映了群体智能协作和性能优化思想。 适用人群:具备一定编程基础,对群体智能、机器人编队控制、时滞系统稳定性分析感兴趣的科研人员和工程师。 使用场景及目标:①理解HVC在仿射编队控制中的应用及其对系统性能的提升;②掌握仿射编队控制的具体实现方法,包括控制器设计、稳定性分析和仿真实验;③学习如何通过引入历史信息(如HVC)来优化群体智能系统的性能;④探索中性型时滞系统的稳定性条件及其在实际系统中的应用。 其他说明:此资源不仅提供了理论分析,还包括完整的Python代码实现,帮助读者从理论到实践全面掌握仿射编队控制技术。代码结构清晰,涵盖了从初始化配置、控制律设计到性能评估的各个环节,并提供了丰富的可视化工具,便于理解和分析系统性能。通过阅读和实践,读者可以深入了解HVC增强仿射编队控制的工作原理及其实际应用效果。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值