一、案例
沿用上一篇博客的实体类User
package com.massimo.reflection;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
//分析性能问题
public class Test08 {
//普通方式调用
public static void test01(){
User user = new User();
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) {
user.getName();
}
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("普通方式执行10亿次:" + (endTime - startTime) + "ms");
}
//反射方式调用
public static void test02() throws ClassNotFoundException, IllegalAccessException, InstantiationException, NoSuchMethodException, InvocationTargetException {
User user = new User();
Class c1 = user.getClass();
Method getName = c1.getDeclaredMethod("getName", null);
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) {
getName.invoke(user , null);
}
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("反射方式执行10亿次:" + (endTime - startTime) + "ms");
}
//反射方式调用,关闭检测
public static void test03() throws ClassNotFoundException, IllegalAccessException, InstantiationException, NoSuchMethodException, InvocationTargetException {
User user = new User();
Class c1 = user.getClass();
Method getName = c1.getDeclaredMethod("getName", null);
getName.setAccessible(true);
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) {
getName.invoke(user , null);
}
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("关闭检测执行10亿次:" + (endTime - startTime) + "ms");
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws ClassNotFoundException, NoSuchMethodException, InvocationTargetException, InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
test01();
test02();
test03();
}
}
效果:

本文通过对比普通方式与反射方式调用方法的性能差异,展示了不同调用方式下执行效率的变化,并进一步探讨了关闭安全检查对反射调用性能的影响。

1186

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



