Life Before Loaders (part 1) Posted Jul 6, 2012 by Alex Lockwood

本文深入探讨了Android应用中使用Loaders和LoaderManager进行数据加载的改进方法,对比了Honeycomb之前的非响应式数据加载方式,强调了Loaders确保后台线程操作、避免UI阻塞及提高用户体验的重要性。

Life Before Loaders (part 1)

Posted Jul 6, 2012
 

This post gives a brief introduction to Loaders and the LoaderManager. The first section describes how data was loaded prior to the release of Android 3.0, pointing out out some of the flaws of the pre-Honeycomb APIs. The second section defines the purpose of each class and summarizes their powerful ability in asynchronously loading data.

This is the first of a series of posts I will be writing on Loaders and the LoaderManager:

If you know nothing about Loaders and the LoaderManager, I strongly recommend you read the documentation before continuing forward.

The Not-So-Distant Past

Before Android 3.0, many Android applications lacked in responsiveness. UI interactions glitched, transitions between activities lagged, and ANR (Application Not Responding) dialogs rendered apps totally useless. This lack of responsiveness stemmed mostly from the fact that developers were performing queries on the UI thread—a very poor choice for lengthy operations like loading data.

While the documentation has always stressed the importance of instant feedback, the pre-Honeycomb APIs simply did not encourage this behavior. Before Loaders, cursors were primarily managed and queried for with two (now deprecated) Activity methods:

  • public void startManagingCursor(Cursor)

    Tells the activity to take care of managing the cursor's lifecycle based on the activity's lifecycle. The cursor will automatically be deactivated (deactivate()) when the activity is stopped, and will automatically be closed (close()) when the activity is destroyed. When the activity is stopped and then later restarted, the Cursor is re-queried (requery()) for the most up-to-date data.

  • public Cursor managedQuery(Uri, String, String, String, String)

    A wrapper around the ContentResolver's query() method. In addition to performing the query, it begins management of the cursor (that is,startManagingCursor(cursor) is called before it is returned).

While convenient, these methods were deeply flawed in that they performed queries on the UI thread. What's more, the "managed cursors" did not retain their data across Activity configuration changes. The need to requery()the cursor's data in these situations was unnecessary, inefficient, and made orientation changes clunky and sluggish as a result.

The Problem with "Managed Cursors"

Let's illustrate the problem with "managed cursors" through a simple code sample. Given below is a ListActivity that loads data using the pre-Honeycomb APIs. The activity makes a query to the ContentProvider and begins management of the returned cursor. The results are then bound to aSimpleCursorAdapter, and are displayed on the screen in a ListView. The code has been condensed for simplicity.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
public class SampleListActivity extends ListActivity {

  private static final String[] PROJECTION = new String[] {"_id", "text_column"};

  @Override
  protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);

    // Performs a "managed query" to the ContentProvider. The Activity 
    // will handle closing and requerying the cursor.
    //
    // WARNING!! This query (and any subsequent re-queries) will be
    // performed on the UI Thread!!
    Cursor cursor = managedQuery(
        CONTENT_URI,  // The Uri constant in your ContentProvider class
        PROJECTION,   // The columns to return for each data row
        null,         // No where clause
        null,         // No where clause
        null);        // No sort order

    String[] dataColumns = { "text_column" };
    int[] viewIDs = { R.id.text_view };
 
    // Create the backing adapter for the ListView.
    //
    // WARNING!! While not readily obvious, using this constructor will 
    // tell the CursorAdapter to register a ContentObserver that will
    // monitor the underlying data source. As part of the monitoring
    // process, the ContentObserver will call requery() on the cursor 
    // each time the data is updated. Since Cursor#requery() is performed 
    // on the UI thread, this constructor should be avoided at all costs!
    SimpleCursorAdapter adapter = new SimpleCursorAdapter(
        this,                // The Activity context
        R.layout.list_item,  // Points to the XML for a list item
        cursor,              // Cursor that contains the data to display
        dataColumns,         // Bind the data in column "text_column"...
        viewIDs);            // ...to the TextView with id "R.id.text_view"

    // Sets the ListView's adapter to be the cursor adapter that was 
    // just created.
    setListAdapter(adapter);
  }
}

There are three problems with the code above. If you have understood this post so far, the first two shouldn't be difficult to spot:

  1. managedQuery performs a query on the main UI thread. This leads to unresponsive apps and should no longer be used.

  2. As seen in the Activity.java source code, the call to managedQuerybegins management of the returned cursor with a call tostartManagingCursor(cursor). Having the activity manage the cursor seems convenient at first, as we no longer need to worry about deactivating/closing the cursor ourselves. However, this signals the activity to call requery() on the cursor each time the activity returns from a stopped state, and therefore puts the UI thread at risk. This cost significantly outweighs the convenience of having the activity deactivate/close the cursor for us.

  3. The SimpleCursorAdapter constructor (line 32) is deprecated and should not be used. The problem with this constructor is that it will have the SimpleCursorAdapter auto-requery its data when changes are made. More specifically, the CursorAdapter will register a ContentObserver that monitors the underlying data source for changes, calling requery() on its bound cursor each time the data is modified. The standard constructor should be used instead (if you intend on loading the adapter's data with a CursorLoader, make sure you pass 0as the last argument). Don't worry if you couldn't spot this one... it's a very subtle bug.

With the first Android tablet about to be released, something had to be done to encourage UI-friendly development. The larger, 7-10" Honeycomb tablets called for more complicated, interactive, multi-paned layouts. Further, the introduction of the Fragment meant that applications were about to become more dynamic and event-driven. A simple, single-threaded approach to loading data could no longer be encouraged. Thus, the Loader and theLoaderManager were born.

Android 3.0, Loaders, and the LoaderManager

Prior to Honeycomb, it was difficult to manage cursors, synchronize correctly with the UI thread, and ensure all queries occurred on a background thread. Android 3.0 introduced the Loader and LoaderManager classes to help simplify the process. Both classes are available for use in the Android Support Library, which supports all Android platforms back to Android 1.6.

The new Loader API is a huge step forward, and significantly improves the user experience. Loaders ensure that all cursor operations are done asynchronously, thus eliminating the possibility of blocking the UI thread. Further, when managed by the LoaderManagerLoaders retain their existing cursor data across the activity instance (for example, when it is restarted due to a configuration change), thus saving the cursor from unnecessary, potentially expensive re-queries. As an added bonus, Loaders are intelligent enough to monitor the underlying data source for updates, re-querying automatically when the data is changed.

Conclusion

Since the introduction of Loaders in Honeycomb and Compatibility Library, Android applications have changed for the better. Making use of the now deprecated startManagingCursor and managedQuery methods are extremely discouraged; not only do they slow down your app, but they can potentially bring it to a screeching halt. Loaders, on the other hand, significantly speed up the user experience by offloading the work to a separate background thread.

In the next post (titled Understanding the LoaderManager), we will go more in-depth on how to fix these problems by completing the transition from "managed cursors" to making use of Loaders and the LoaderManager.

Don't forget to +1 this blog in the top right corner if you found this helpful!

Last updated January 18, 2014.
**项目名称:** 基于Vue.js与Spring Cloud架构的博客系统设计与开发——微服务分布式应用实践 **项目概述:** 本项目为计算机科学与技术专业本科毕业设计成果,旨在设计并实现一个采用前后端分离架构的现代化博客平台。系统前端基于Vue.js框架构建,提供响应式用户界面;后端采用Spring Cloud微服务架构,通过服务拆分、注册发现、配置中心及网关路由等技术,构建高可用、易扩展的分布式应用体系。项目重点探讨微服务模式下的系统设计、服务治理、数据一致性及部署运维等关键问题,体现了分布式系统在Web应用中的实践价值。 **技术架构:** 1. **前端技术栈:** Vue.js 2.x、Vue Router、Vuex、Element UI、Axios 2. **后端技术栈:** Spring Boot 2.x、Spring Cloud (Eureka/Nacos、Feign/OpenFeign、Ribbon、Hystrix、Zuul/Gateway、Config) 3. **数据存储:** MySQL 8.0(主数据存储)、Redis(缓存与会话管理) 4. **服务通信:** RESTful API、消息队列(可选RabbitMQ/Kafka) 5. **部署与运维:** Docker容器化、Jenkins持续集成、Nginx负载均衡 **核心功能模块:** - 用户管理:注册登录、权限控制、个人中心 - 文章管理:富文本编辑、分类标签、发布审核、评论互动 - 内容展示:首页推荐、分类检索、全文搜索、热门排行 - 系统管理:后台仪表盘、用户与内容监控、日志审计 - 微服务治理:服务健康检测、动态配置更新、熔断降级策略 **设计特点:** 1. **架构解耦:** 前后端完全分离,通过API网关统一接入,支持独立开发与部署。 2. **服务拆分:** 按业务域划分为用户服务、文章服务、评论服务、文件服务等独立微服务。 3. **高可用设计:** 采用服务注册发现机制,配合负载均衡与熔断器,提升系统容错能力。 4. **可扩展性:** 模块化设计支持横向扩展,配置中心实现运行时动态调整。 **项目成果:** 完成了一个具备完整博客功能、具备微服务典型特征的分布式系统原型,通过容器化部署验证了多服务协同运行的可行性,为云原生应用开发提供了实践参考。 资源来源于网络分享,仅用于学习交流使用,请勿用于商业,如有侵权请联系我删除!
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值