论文概览 |《Journal of Urban Technology》2024 Vol.31 Issue.1

本次给大家整理的是《Journal of Urban Technology》杂志2024年第31卷第1期的论文的题目和摘要，一共包括8篇SCI论文！

---

论文1

Cities and Smart Technology: The Case of Cycling

城市与智能技术：以骑行为例

【摘要】

The term ‘smart cities’ describes a bundle of informational technologies that are profoundly reconfiguring how cities are managed and experienced. This piece is an introduction to a special issue of the journal on cycling, cities, and smart technology. For all the attention on smart cities within the social sciences, surprisingly little scholarship has focused on the ways that specific technologies and practices are enrolled or incorporated into ideas and visions for the smart city or smart urbanism. The articles in the special issue “Cities and Smart Technology: The Case of Cycling” seek to address this lacuna.

【摘要翻译】

“智慧城市”这个术语描述了一系列信息技术，这些技术正在深刻地重新配置城市的管理和体验方式。这篇文章是关于城市、骑行与智能技术的专题期刊的介绍。尽管社会科学领域对智慧城市给予了很多关注，但令人惊讶的是，学术界对具体技术和实践如何被纳入或融入智慧城市或智慧城市主义的理念和愿景的研究却很少。专题期刊《城市与智能技术：骑行的案例》中的文章旨在填补这一空白。

【doi】https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2024.2347806
【作者信息】

Anna Nikolaeva，阿姆斯特丹社会科学研究所，阿姆斯特丹大学，荷兰阿姆斯特丹

Alan Latham，伦敦大学学院地理学部，伦敦大学学院，戈弗街，伦敦

---

论文2

Community Smarts in Grassroots Initiatives to Support Cycling and Walking in Large Urban Areas

在大城市中支持骑行和步行的基层倡议中的社区智慧

【摘要】

In the popular imagination, smart mobility, much like the smart city, is a high-tech utopia of mobility efficiency and environmental sustainability. However, a growing body of literature is questioning the promises associated with “digital solutions,” particularly with respect to the neoliberal rationales behind their deployment. On the other hand, relatively few scholars have taken the same critical analysis to smart mobility. In this article we draw on interviews with leaders of grassroots organizations that support walking and cycling among marginalized communities in São Paulo and London to argue that “smart” interventions in active transportation do not have to be top-down, technocratic, or necessarily digital, though they may be so, when informed by community input. We suggest that the locally sensitive knowledge behind grassroots initiatives may demonstrate a form of “community smarts” that enhances capabilities and itself informs whether or not, and if so how, to use digital technologies to advance social and environmental missions.
 

【摘要翻译】

在大众想象中，智能出行就