Exploration 评分标准如何获得满分6分?
概述:
该标准评估学生是否恰当地为其研究工作构建了科学背景(background),是否陈述了一个清晰而聚焦的研究问题,是否使用了适合IB课程级别的物理概念和实验技术。在适当的情况下,该标准还评估对安全、环境和道德考虑的认识。
This criterion assesses the extent to which the student establishes the scientificcontext for the work, states a clear and focused research question, and usesconcepts and techniques appropriate to the IB Diploma Programme level. Where appropriate, this criterion also assesses awareness of safety, environmental,and ethical considerations.

需要几乎具有所有下面描述的特征才能得到满分6:
从Introduction看:
- The research question is clearly stated in the introduction./Introduction中明确称述了研究问题。
从Researchquestion 和Variables看:
- The research question has sufficient scope and is sharplyfocused./研究问题有足够的范围且重点突出。
- All relevant variables were identified: independent, dependent, control variables./确定了所有的相关变量:自变量、应变量、控制变量。
从Background看:
Theoretical background to investigation is explained./解释了研究问题的理论背景。
从Material list看:
- A complete list of materials and apparatus was given–including sizes, concentrations, precision where possible./给出了材料和设备的完整清单——如尺寸、浓度、精度。
从Method/Procedure看:
- An appropriate method is used, i.e., a method that allows the collection of sufficient and relevant data. 采用了合适的实验方法,即采用的方法能收集足够多且相关的数据。
- The method is described fully, showing attention to detail to carry out the same investigation./ 充分描述了方法,包括对实验细节的描述, 因此他人可重复研究。
- The method clearly shows how variables are controlled and dependent and independent variables aremeasured.方法清楚地揭示了如何测量因变量和自变量、如何控制了控制变量。
- Adaptation of method is seen to reduce errors. /优化了方法以减小误差。
从Safety, environmental and ethical issues看:
- Relevant safety alerts are stated. /描述了相关的安全隐患。
- Deals with environmental and ethical issues where relevant,e.g., how to dispose of hazardous chemicals. /处理了相关的环境和道德问题,例如:如何处置危险化学品。
从Raw data看:
- For a particular independent variable, repeats are done to reduce random error. /同一自变量取值下,多次测量了因变量以减小随机误差。
- The Independent variable is varied at least five times./自变量变化了至少 5 次。
本文详细解读如何在IB物理课程中通过科学背景构建、清晰研究问题陈述、适用概念与实验技术、安全环保伦理考量等方面达到Exploration评分的6分标准,涵盖从引言到数据处理的全方位指导。

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



