WRITING EFFICIENT C++

 0.引用

C语言和C++哪个效率更高？老司机3句话告诉你答案

 1.INDEX

Chapter 25: WrITING EFFICIENT C++  881
Overview of Performance and Efficiency  882
Two Approaches to Efficiency  882
Two Kinds of Programs  882
Is C++ an Inefficient Language?  882
Language-Level Efficiency  883
Handle Objects Efficiently  884
Pass-by-Reference  884
Return-by-Reference  886
Catch Exceptions by Reference  886
Use Move Semantics  886
Avoid Creating Temporary Objects  886
The Return-Value Optimization  887
Pre-allocate Memory  888
Use Inline Methods and Functions  888
Design-Level Efficiency  889
Cache Where Necessary  889
Use Object Pools  890
An Object Pool Implementation  891
Using the Object Pool  893
Profiling  894
Profiling Example with gprof  895
First Design Attempt  895
Profiling the First Design Attempt  898
Second Design Attempt  900
Profiling the Second Design Attempt  901
Profiling Example with Visual C++ 2017  902
Summary  907

2. OVERVIEW OF PERFORMANCE AND EFFICIENCY

Before delving further into the details, it’s helpful to define the terms performance 
and efficiency,as used in this book. The performance of a program can refer to several
areas, such as speed,memory usage, disk access, and network use. This chapter focuses 
on speed performance. The term efficiency, when applied to programs, means running 
without wasted effort. An efficient program completes its tasks as quickly as possible 
within the given circumstances. A program can be efficient without being fast, if the 
application domain is inherently prohibitive to quick execution. Note that the title 
of this chapter, “Writing Efficient C++,” means writing programs that run efficiently,
not efficiently writing programs. That is, the time you learn to save by reading this 
chapter will be your users’, not your own!

NOTE  An efficient, or high-performance, program runs as fast as is possible for
the particular tasks.

2.1 Two Approaches to Efficiency 

Language-level efficiency involves using the language as efficiently as possible, for example, pass-
ing objects by reference instead of by value. However, this will only get you so far. Much more
important is design-level efficiency, which includes choosing efficient algorithms, avoiding unneces-
sary steps and computations, and selecting appropriate design optimizations. More often than not,
optimizing existing code involves replacing a bad algorithm or data structure with a better, more
efficient one.

2.2 Two Kinds of Programs

As I’ve noted, efficiency is important for all application domains. Additionally, 
there is a small subset of programs, such as system-level software, embedded 
systems, intensive computational applications, and real-time games, that require 
extremely high levels of efficiency. Most programs don’t.Unless you write those 
types of high-performance applications, you probably don’t need to worry about 
squeezing every ounce  of speed out of your C++ code. Think of it as the difference 
between building normal family cars and building sports cars. Every car must be 
reasonably efficient, but sports cars require extremely high performance. You 
wouldn’t want to waste your time optimizing family cars for speed when they’ll 
never go faster than 70 miles per hour.

2.3 Is C++ an Inefficient Language?

C programmers often resist using C++ for high-performance applications. They claim that the
language is inherently less efficient than C or a similar procedural language because C++ 
includes high-level concepts, such as exceptions and virtual methods. However, there 
are problems with this argument.


When discussing the efficiency of a language, you must separate the performance
 capabilities of the language itself from the effectiveness of its compilers at 
optimizing  it, that is, you cannot ignore the effect of compilers. Recall that 
the C or C++ code you write is not the code that the computer executes. A compiler 
first translates that code into machine language, applying optimizations in the
process. This means that you can’t simply run benchmarks of C and C++ programs and 
compare the results. You’re really comparing the compiler optimizations of the 
languages, not the languages themselves. C++ compilers can optimize away many of the 
high-level constructs in the language to generate machine code similar to, or even 
better than, the machine code generated from a comparable C program. These days, much 
more research and development is poured into C++ compilers than into C compilers, so 
C++ code might actually get better optimized and might run faster than C code.



Critics, however, still maintain that some features of C++ cannot be optimized away. 
For example,as Chapter 10 explains, virtual methods require the existence of a vtable
and an additional level of indirection at run time, possibly making them slower than 
regular non-virtual function calls. However, when you really think about it, this 
argument is unconvincing. Virtual method calls provide more than just a function call: 
they also give you a run-time choice of which function to call.
A comparable non-virtual function call would need a conditional statement to decide 
which function to call. If you don’t need those extra semantics, you can use a 
non-virtual function. A general design rule in the C++ language is that “if you don’t 
use a feature, you don’t need to pay for it.” If you don’t use virtual methods, you 
pay no performance penalty for the fact that you could use them. Thus, non-virtual 
function  calls in C++ are identical to function calls in C in terms of 
performance.However, because virtual function calls have such a tiny overhead, I 
recommend making all your class methods, including destructors but not constructors, 
virtual for all your  non-final classes.
Far more important, the high-level constructs of C++ enable you to write cleaner 
programs that are more efficient at the design level, are more readable, more easily 
maintained, and avoid accumulating unnecessary and dead code.
I believe that you will be better served in your development, performance, and 
maintenance by choosing C++ instead of a procedural language such as C.
There are also other higher-level object-oriented languages such as C# and Java, both 
of which run on top of a virtual machine. C++ code is executed directly by a CPU; 
there is no such thing as a virtual machine to run your code. C++ is closer to the 
hardware, which means that in most cases it runs faster than languages such as C# 
and Java.

3.LANGUAGE-LEVEL EFFICIENCY

Many books, articles, and programmers spend a lot of time trying to convince you to apply language-
level optimizations to your code. These tips and tricks are important, and can speed up your programs
in some cases. However, they are far less important than the overall design and algorithm choices in
your program. You can pass-by-reference all you want, but it won’t make your program fast if you per-
form twice as many disk writes as you need to. It’s easy to get bogged down in references and pointers
and forget about the big picture.
Furthermore, some of these language-level tricks can be performed automatically by good optimiz-
ing compilers. You should never spend time optimizing a particular area, unless a profiler, discussed
later in this chapter, tells you that that particular area is a bottleneck.

That being said, using certain language-level optimizations, such as pass-by-reference, is just consid-
ered good coding style.
In this book, I’ve tried to present a balance of strategies. So, I’ve included here what I feel are the
most useful language-level optimizations. This list is not comprehensive, but is a good start to write
optimized code. However, make sure to read, and practice, the design-level efficiency advice that I
offer later in this chapter as well.

WARNING  Apply language-level optimizations judiciously. I recommend making a clean, 
well-structured design and implementation first. Then use a profiler,
and only invest time optimizing those parts that are flagged by a profiler as being
a performance bottleneck.

3.1