Working Identity by Herminia Ibarra

本文探讨了职业生涯转型的非传统策略,强调了通过实际行动而非深思熟虑来发现自我,以及在多种可能的身份中进行测试的重要性。文章指出,成功的转型不是找到一个真正的自我,而是开始一个多步骤的过程,设想并测试可能的未来。

Then indecision brings its own delays,

And days are lost lamenting o’er lost days.

Are you in earnest? Seize this very minute;

What you can do, or dream you can, begin it;

Boldness has genius, power and magic in it.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


儒家君子之道有三:仁者不忧、知者不惑、勇者不惧。


“真实的自我”植根于过去,而“可能的自我”则立足于现在与未来。一部分“可能的自我”通过你当前所做的事情和我们现在所在的公司确定,另一些“可能的自我”却仍然是模糊不清的,只存在于你的个人梦想之中。


人们通过实践而不是通过“反省”来了解自己“可能的自我”。


急切的重大的改变会欲速则不达。一步一步地采取一些小的措施反而会使我们在重新界定自己的职业身份时,做到更加全面和更有依据。

大多数职业生涯的转变都需要3年左右的时间,这个轨迹很少成为一条直线——我们进两步退一步,最终驻足的地方会让自己大吃一惊。


要想告别过去,你必须敢于涉足未知的关系网络,这不仅仅是为了能够寻找新的门路,更重要的是真正认识自己想成为什么样的人,最有可能帮助我们认识真正自我的人往往是那些我们不熟悉的人。


It is nearly impossible to think out how to reinvent ourselves, and, therefore, it is equally hard to execute in a planned and orderly way. A successful outcome hinges less on knowing one’s inner, true self at the start than on starting a multistep process of envisioning and testing possible futures. No amount of self-reflection can substitute for the direct experience we need to evaluate alternatives according to criteria that change as we do.


Making important career moves, and ultimately, life changes, requires us to live through long periods of uncertainty and doubt.


The more unfamiliar the new possibilities, the more necessary it becomes to learn about them through direct involvement rather than planning. Because so many new ideas and bits of information surface once we get moving, spending too much time up front figuring out “the plan” wastes energy.


How do we move forward and reinvent ourselves when our very selves have been so shaken? For starters, we must reframe the questions, abandoning the conventional career-advice queries— “Who am I?”—in favor of more open-ended alternatives—“Among the many possible selves that I might become, which is most intriguing to me now? Which is easiest to test?” Getting started depends on whether we are looking to find our one true self or whether, instead, we are trying to test and evaluate possible alternatives.


A very different definition of working identity asserts that we are not one true self but many selves and that those identities exist not only in the past and present but also, and most importantly, in the future. Based on the work of Stanford cognitive psychologist Hazel Markus, this possible-selves model reveals that we all carry around, in our hearts and minds, a whole cast of characters, the selves we hope to become, think we should become, or even fear becoming in the future. During a career transition, our possible selves spur us to find role models whom we’d like to become (and whom to avoid becoming) and help us to benchmark our progress toward those ideals. The more vivid these possible selves become, the more they motivate us to change. Why? Because we strive to become more and more like our ideals, and we scare ourselves out of becoming our most dreaded selves.


Only by testing do we learn what is really appealing and feasible—and, in the process, create our own opportunities.


Working identity is not just who we are. It is also who we are not. Being able to discard possibilities means we are making progress.


Our close contacts don’t just blind us, they also bind us to our outdated identities. Reinventing involves trying on and testing a variety of possible selves.

 


But the reason I wanted out, really, was much more fundamental. I just believed that if I stayed there until, say, age fifty-five,

and then put my feet up for five years and then at age sixty looked back on what I’d done, I would not feel that I had made the most of my one unrepeatable life. So I decided I had to get out.


Until we have a story, others view us as unfocused. It is harder to get their help. Equally important is having a good story to tell others, putting it into the public sphere even before it is fully formed. By making public declarations about what we seek and what common thread binds our old and new selves, we clarify our intentions and improve our ability to enlist others’ support. Like Roy Holstrom’s elevator pitch, this is partially a problem of self-marketing. We need someone to take a chance on us since, by definition, we are moving into a new and unproven realm. Potential employers or coworkers come to know (and therefore, trust) us when they know our story and can accept it as legitimate. Sometimes it takes many rehearsals before it comes out just right. What happens in the retelling is not just a more polished story; we finally settle on a narrative that can inform the next step.


If we knew from the start what it meant to be fully ourselves, finding a new career would be so much easier. But because we are growing and changing all the time, the oft-cited key to a better working life, "knowing yourself", turns out to e the prize at the end of the journey rather than the light at its beginning.


We don’t find ourselves in a blinding flash of insight, and neither do we change overnight. We learn by doing, and each new experience is part answer and part question.


 

People did make trade-offs: Some struggled with lower incomes when they chose to pursue their passion, and others gave up some measure of challenge or intellectual stimulation in pursuit of a more secure future. But I heard great regret only from those who failed to act, who were unable or unwilling to put their dreams to the test and to find out for themselves if there were better alternatives. The only wrong move consisted of no move.


Unconventional strategy 1:

Act your way into a new way of thinking and being. You cannot discover yourself by introspection.

Unconventional strategy 2:

Stop trying to find your one true self. Focus your attention on which of your many possible selves you want to test and learn more about.

Unconventional strategy 3:

Allow yourself a transition period in which it is okay to oscillate between holding on and letting go. Better to live the contradictions than to come to a premature resolution.

Unconventional strategy 4:

Resist the temptation to start by making a big decision that will change everything in one fell swoop. Use a strategy of small wins, in which incremental gains lead you to more profound changes in the basic assumptions that define your work and life. Accept the crooked path.

Small steps lead to big changes, so don’t waste time, energy, and money on finding the “answer” or the “lever” that, when pushed, will have dramatic effects. Almost no one gets change right on the first try. Forget about moving in a straight line. You will probably have to cycle through a few times, letting what you learn inform the next cycle. You will know that you are learning at a deeper level when you start to question what aspects of your life apart from your job also need changing.

Unconventional strategy 5:

Identify projects that can help you get a feel for a new line of work or style of working. Try to do these as extracurricular activities or parallel paths so that you can experiment seriously without making a commitment.

Unconventional strategy 6:

Don’t just focus on the work. Find people who are what you want to be and who can provide support for the transition. But don’t expect to find them in your same old social circles.

Unconventional strategy 7:

Don’t wait for a cataclysmic moment when the truth is revealed. Use everyday occurrences to find meaning in the changes you are going through. Practice telling and retelling your story. Over time, it will clarify.

Unconventional strategy 8:

Step back. But not for too long. When you get stuck and are short on insight, take time to step back from the fray to reflect on how and why you are changing. Even as short a break as a day’s hike in the country can remove the blinders of habit. But don’t stay gone too long, or it will be hard to reel yourself back in. Only through interaction and active engagement in the real world do we discover ourselves.

Unconventional strategy 9:

Change happens in bursts and starts. There are times when you are open to big change and times when you are not. Seize opportunities.



【电能质量扰动】基于ML和DWT的电能质量扰动分类方法研究(Matlab实现)内容概要:本文研究了一种基于机器学习(ML)和离散小波变换(DWT)的电能质量扰动分类方法,并提供了Matlab实现方案。首先利用DWT对电能质量信号进行多尺度分解,提取信号的时频域特征,有效捕捉电压暂降、暂升、中断、谐波、闪变等常见扰动的关键信息;随后结合机器学习分类器(如SVM、BP神经网络等)对提取的特征进行训练与分类,实现对不同类型扰动的自动识别与准确区分。该方法充分发挥DWT在信号去噪与特征提取方面的优势,结合ML强大的模式识别能力,提升了分类精度与鲁棒性,具有较强的实用价值。; 适合人群:电气工程、自动化、电力系统及其自动化等相关专业的研究生、科研人员及从事电能质量监测与分析的工程技术人员;具备一定的信号处理基础和Matlab编程能力者更佳。; 使用场景及目标:①应用于智能电网中的电能质量在线监测系统,实现扰动类型的自动识别;②作为高校或科研机构在信号处理、模式识别、电力系统分析等课程的教学案例或科研实验平台;③目标是提高电能质量扰动分类的准确性与效率,为后续的电能治理与设备保护提供决策依据。; 阅读建议:建议读者结合Matlab代码深入理解DWT的实现过程与特征提取步骤,重点关注小波基选择、分解层数设定及特征向量构造对分类性能的影响,并尝试对比不同机器学习模型的分类效果,以全面掌握该方法的核心技术要点。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值